Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Bailout- What it means to You- Tucson Home Buyer or Seller

With news of the government takeover of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac spreading faster than a desert wildfire, consumers are now filled with relief, but they are also looking for answers. People want to (& have a right to) know how the government will change Fannie & Freddie, who will foot the bill, and how this impacts them, both financially (as far as taxes go), but also when they want to buy or sell a home in Tucson. It doesn't take much guess work to figure out that taxpayers are going to be the ones taking the hit head on by the bailout. This post will address what the takeover means for the real estate market, interest rates, and the American economy as a whole.

If I had to guess what the Fannie & Freddie takeover means for mortgage rates, I would have to say (at least in the short run), I would expect interest rates to drop. They already have since yesterday! The government understands the dynamics of our blighted real estate market. The Fed has been attempting to lower mortgage rates for the last year to try to right a shaky real estate market. This has been a battle between fears of hyper or stagflation, and what needs to happen to mortgage interest rates if buyer demand is going to improve. The Fed has lowered the prime rate several times in an attempt to lower mortgage interest rates, which would have (if it had worked) helped the housing market. However, over the last several months mortgage interest rates have for the most part gone up, instead of down. This could possibly be due to banks tightening up on controls over funding new loans, and newer more strict underwriting guidelines, as well as banks trying to protect their bottom lines. But now that the government has full control of Fannie & Freddie- whose primary responsibility has been to bundle mortgages (securitization) in order to provide sufficient funding for these mortgages- our treasury will have more extensive control over the mortgage market, and therefore (it is theorized) better control over mortgage rates. As long as the government's objective remains the same as the Fed's (to keep the real estate market active by lowering the prime rate), it is probably safe to say that- at least in the short term, mortgage interest rates will decline.

What does the Fannie/Freddie takeover reveal about the real estate market? You don't have to look too far, or even across town to see the signs of a depressed market & realize that both the Tucson real estate market and the national real estate market face serious issues. Foreclosures are at record high levels. Consumer confidence is at a record low level. Both local & national real estate markets are stagnating under the pressure. The Fannie/Freddie takeover is big time! It has been stated as being the biggest financial bailout of our nation's history. The bailout happened because the government realized that markets were no longer capable of righting themselves. The foreclosure crisis is one of epic proportions. In addition to consumers losing confidence in the real estate market, foreign investors were losing confidence in the two mortgage giants, causing more and more retreating by both parties. In essence, the theory was that if nothing were done (by the government) that our nation was headed for an economic disaster of catastrophic proportions. Possibly a second Great Depression. I do agree that something had to be done, and this does seem to me (a Tucson real estate professional for nine years) to be the right choice, maybe the only choice?

How is the Fannie/Freddie bailout going to effect the real estate market, both locally and nationally? The bailout presents an obviously ominous sign about weakness in both local and national real estate markets. However, it is believed by many experts that the bailout will (in due time) have a positive effect on the the local Tucson and the national real estate markets. If mortgage interest rates decline, as many experts believe will happen as an outcome of the bailout, this should act as a great 'leg up' for an ailing real estate market. Buyers can get more house for their money, and more buyers can qualify when mortgage interest rates are lower (part of the reason we got in this crisis to begin with, and theoretically what caused home prices to rise at unprecedented levels). Just yesterday, rates on 30 year fixed rate mortgages fell to 5.875% from 6.125% at the outset of the day. Any reduction in interest rates should have the effect of increasing buyer demand. Additionally, lower mortgage interest rates could help to shore up declining real estate values, as buyers' buying power increases, helping to spur additional demand. Hopefully the effect will also be to restore consumer confidence in the real estate market, and give buyers who have been on the fence (anticipating further falls in home prices) to buy. If this happens (and buying activity increases), it will be an injection into both the local and national economies, and our government is well aware of that fact. The economy as a whole will benefit if local and national real estate pictures brighten.

It is additionally hopeful that the bailout of Fannie & Freddie will ease up some of the recent mortgage restrictions the two giants created. These restrictions were created in an attempt to gain tighter control over lending practices and prevent further foreclosures, which translate to big time losses for lenders (and the entities that insure them). While none of us wants the mortgage market to return to the kind of cavalier cowboy lending that led to this crisis to begin with, many of the recently enacted underwriting rules and lender's guidelines seem to be overly restrictive. For example, I had a closing about a month ago, in which a lender (not to be named) would not allow a credit to the buyer's closing costs for repairs. Instead, all of the repairs had to be completed prior to closing, with receipts provided for their completion. This is obviously to prevent buyers from pocketing the repair credit & allowing the house to fall into disrepair. But it makes it challenging when contractors cannot get repairs done prior to closing dates. (There is usually only a window of about two to three weeks prior to the closing date once repairs are negotiated between buyer & seller). At any rate, some of these rules have been enacted in an obvious attempt to protect lenders from further erosion of profit margins. However, current lending restrictions have become more restrictive than any we have seen since the savings & loan debacle. Hopefully this will mean that a federally controlled Fannie & Freddie will enable us to return to more normalized and less restrictive lending criteria because lenders will have the government to back them up.

Obviously, the biggest concern of the bailout is that it has the potential to make taxpayers foot the bill for billions of dollars in mortgage loan losses. In the short term, it will be necessary for the government to infuse money into Fannie & Freddie to keep them solvent. Due to big risks taken during the housing boom, both companies (especially Freddie) have been losing money and foreign investment shareholders for a few years. It is estimated that the government will will have to provide a cash infusion into Fannie & Freddie to enable them to restore to financial solvency. Said Andy Laperriere, managing director of ISI group, "...It's a pretty high likelihood since it (the government) devised a plan to take the companies over." (WSJ 9/9/08). At any rate, the government bailout is sure to be at a very high cost for both the government and for taxpayers. All of this coming at a time of both economic and political uncertainty. I suppose the alternative was allowing Fannie & Freddie to fail completely, which could have led the entire mortgage & real estate industries- potentially even the entire US economy- into a complete tailspin. Overall, the government found itself in a tough situation and decided that they were in the best position to come to Fannie & Freddie's rescue, with the auspicious goal of aiding the entire US economy (at a cost not yet mentioned to taxpayers).

The bailout has already helped the stock market have a rally yesterday (both here in the US & also world stock markets). In general, a lot of what happens in markets (both real estate & stocks) is psychological. If consumers believe that it will have a positive affect, then sometimes that can provide enough of a boost to kick start the markets. Remember the movie, "Field of Dreams?" Kevin Costner's famous line (one that I use all the time) was, "If you build it, they will come." Hopefully this will be the case & we can get the real estate market and the US economy back on track. In addition to unknown costs to taxpayers, The Fannie & Freddie bailout will surely be a big thorn in the side of whoever becomes the next president of our nation. Said Eugene Ludwig, former US Comptroller of the Currency, "It's appropriate for the government to help in these extraordinary circumstances because market psychology has overruled economic reality, placing our nation's well being at risk." (WSJ 9/9/08).

Written by Sarah Ley,
BSBA, ABR, CRS, CHNSA
Tucson Realtor with Long Realty
Direct: (520) 404-0544
http://www.sarahley.longrealty.com/
sley@longrealty.com